As negotiations over the ongoing conflict in Ukraine continue, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent comments reflect a deepening resolve to control the eastern Donbas region. Amidst diplomatic discussions with U.S. representatives, it remains clear that the intricate dynamics between Russia and Ukraine, juxtaposed with international involvement, complicate the path to peace. Understanding these tensions not only highlights the geopolitical stakes but also the human cost of extended warfare.
Russian President Vladimir Putin described recent discussions with U.S. negotiators regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine as “very useful,” reiterating the unyielding demands and territorial aspirations that hinder a peaceful resolution. As he prepares for a trip to New Delhi, Putin expressed to India Today TV his intention to assert control over Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region through force if necessary, confirming Kremlin reports that there was no consensus in the prior talks with U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
In his remarks, Putin stated, “It all boils down to this: either we will liberate these territories by force, or Ukrainian troops will leave these territories and stop fighting there.” His statements come nine months after he deployed tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine, following eight years of conflict between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces in the Donbas region, which includes Donetsk and Luhansk. This renewed commitment to territorial control seems to contradict U.S. President Donald Trump’s earlier claims that Wittkoff and Kushner believed Putin wished to reach a peaceful agreement.
Amid the ongoing negotiations, embattled Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has resisted any suggestion that he possesses the authority to concede Ukrainian land. He maintains that Ukraine should not be penalized for Russian actions and notes that the Ukrainian constitution prohibits the relinquishment of territory.
In discussions with U.S. representatives regarding a potential peace agreement, Russia has consistently demanded full control of the Donbas region and informal recognition of this control from Washington. High-profile discussions in Geneva sought to refine a previous 28-point peace plan proposed by Trump, which faced significant pushback from Ukrainian negotiators who insisted upon modifications.
Although it remains uncertain which drafts have been the focus of current discussions, Putin’s aides have confirmed that the 28-point outline, which details Moscow’s demands, is still under negotiation. According to Putin, this plan comprises several packages that retain similar points despite being reorganized.
Reporting from Moscow, Al Jazeera’s Yulia Shapovalova emphasized that Russia is unlikely to soften its stance regarding what it deems “red lines,” asserting that any agreements would require recognition of Russian interests. The recent atmosphere of dialogue has been characterized as obstructed, with substantial discrepancies in available positions.
As this complex narrative unfolds, the toll of conflict is becoming increasingly evident. Reports of continued Russian military strikes on civilian areas in Ukraine—including a recent ballistic missile attack on Kryvyi Rih—have resulted in injuries, including those to children, and significant damage to infrastructure.
Simultaneously, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova accused Ukraine of undermining the peace process through its military actions in the Black Sea and elsewhere. Current estimates indicate that Russia controls approximately 19.2 percent of Ukrainian territory, including Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, amidst ongoing confrontations in various regions.
With active military engagement persisting, Ukraine’s army asserts its ongoing presence in critical regions, asserting that approximately 5,000 square kilometers of Donetsk remains under Ukrainian control. As such, the prospect for resolution remains entangled in diplomatic complexities and battlefield realities.
#MiddleEastNews #WorldNews