Recent disclosures regarding covert plots aimed at destabilizing Syria’s Alawite coastal region reveal a deeper narrative about the historical complexities and shifting dynamics within the country. As elite exiles from the previous Assad regime schemingly plot a comeback, many ordinary Alawites have come to terms with their current circumstances, reflecting a broader struggle for stability amidst a backdrop of economic hardship and political transition. The revelations accentuate an urgent need for a collaborative and inclusive approach that unifies diverse communities rather than exacerbating divisions.
In recent days, leaked recordings and documents have unveiled a significant conspiracy orchestrated by high-level officials from the former regime of Bashar al-Assad, now living in exile, to launch an insurgency in Syria’s Alawite-dominated coastal region. The leaks outline efforts to recruit fighters from within the Alawite community, alongside the movement and storage of weapons, and financial support for fighters’ families. This alarming development follows a violent insurrection in March that claimed more than 1,000 lives, including civilians, government troops, and Alawite fighters.
Further violence erupted in July in Suwayda, a Druze stronghold in southern Syria, where clashes between Sunni tribes and Druze militias led to the deaths of several hundred Druze civilians. This scene of unrest has also been marked by sporadic clashes between the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and government forces, despite a March agreement aimed at integrating the SDF into Syria’s national army.
The growing concerns regarding the potential fragmentation of minority-dominated regions pose a substantial threat to Syria’s territorial integrity. However, this development is not preordained. The leaked materials indicate that remnants of the al-Assad regime are seeking a resurgence, yet they remain largely disconnected from the Alawite majority, who appear more focused on everyday survival amidst economic deprivation and insecurity.
The majority of Alawites, profoundly shaken by what they perceive as betrayal by the Assad family, seem resigned to living under a new authority and striving to adapt. While a small faction may fantasize about reclaiming power, the economic realities overshadow any ambitions for secession or regime restoration. The widespread poverty, exacerbated by the dismantling of state institutions and the lack of transitional justice, has left thousands of families struggling, including pensioners who have not been paid in over a year.
Any resurgence of violence among Alawites is likely to stem from desperation rather than political ideology. The ongoing absence of transitional justice stokes tensions and encourages cycles of revenge killings, driven by collective blame directed at the Alawite community. Many now advocate for the government’s publication of a list identifying former regime officials responsible for significant crimes to promote individual accountability and alleviate collective guilt.
The situation in Suwayda is equally intricate. The local Druze community has firmly resisted government forces, with prominent spiritual leaders like Hikmat al-Hijri moving toward greater autonomy following the March massacres. This resistance has given rise to the formation of a “National Guard,” comprised of former regime officers and funded by external support, accentuating calls for independence.
In northeast Syria, the SDF’s commitment to holding on to its political and military gains poses another challenge for the Damascus government. A recent failure to implement the March 10 agreement led to renewed clashes in Kurdish neighborhoods, raising concerns of renewed civil strife along ethnic lines.
While dark predictions of Syria returning to civil war loom, they have not yet materialized. However, significant challenges remain. With limited support and fears of outside intervention, the Syrian government has found it increasingly difficult to unify a fractured nation. The minorities possess insufficient capacity to challenge the regime, while Damascus lacks the means to fully suppress them, leading the country towards a precarious stalemate that could solidify into a de facto partition.
Despite Israel’s provocative actions, which include recognizing Somaliland to manipulate sectarian divisions in Syria, there are also external forces invested in preserving a stable and unified Syrian state. The United States, wary of the resurgence of extremist groups, is urging both the SDF and Damascus to adhere to the March agreement. Likewise, Turkey aims to prevent Kurdish independence while European nations focus on stabilizing the region to facilitate the return of Syrian refugees.
To safeguard Syria’s unity, the current regime must not rely solely on external powers. It is crucial to initiate an inclusive political process that leads to the establishment of a unity government. Facilitating a national dialogue to draft a new constitution with wide-ranging participation from Syria’s diverse political, ethnic, and sectarian groups could garner much-needed support in troubled regions. Moreover, addressing socioeconomic challenges through focused economic policies aimed at alleviating poverty and tackling high unemployment will be essential. Such endeavors, alongside transitional justice measures, can pave the way for healing and reconciliation.
Combating the detrimental influences aimed at fragmenting Syria will require resolute actions and collaborative strategies that champion unity and stability.
#MiddleEastNews #PoliticsNews