The tradition of the handshake in Kenyan politics serves as a poignant symbol of unity, often emerging when entrenched rivals find common ground. This practice, which has historical roots in the colonial era, represents both the power dynamics and the intricate negotiations within Kenya’s political landscape. The handshake has frequently functioned as a strategy employed by the political elite to create agreements that can derail potential shifts toward meaningful reform, which may disrupt the established political framework.
Historically, this custom can be traced back to the early days of British colonial rule, during which local leaders were integrated into the colonial administration, providing them with incentives to maintain their loyalty to foreign powers. A notable instance occurred shortly before Kenya gained independence in 1963, when British authorities made a controversial agreement with Jomo Kenyatta, a leader who had been unjustly accused of orchestrating the Mau Mau uprising and was imprisoned for several years. Although initially marginalized, Kenyatta was ultimately positioned as a key figure in the new government, highlighting the complexities of colonial power dynamics.
In the years following independence, the handshake emerged as a mechanism to negotiate power struggles and suppress public dissent. Prominent journalists have remarked on its cynical utility, recognizing how such agreements can facilitate personal gain for political leaders while stifling genuine progress. The handshake reached a critical juncture during the 2008 post-election crisis that led to significant violence and unrest. An agreement forged at that time not only quelled immediate tensions but also ushered in governance strategies that raised questions about accountability and equity.
One of the leading figures in this handshake narrative is Raila Odinga, a prominent opposition leader who has engaged in multiple power-sharing agreements throughout his career. Although he has not officially claimed a presidential victory, his strategic collaborations with successive presidents highlight his political resilience. In recent months, Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement entered into a memorandum of understanding with President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance. This latest agreement has garnered attention, given Ruto’s past reluctance to engage with Odinga following their competitive political histories.
The current handshake, framed as a collaborative effort to address national challenges, particularly comes in the wake of earlier youth-led protests that had initially sidelined established political figures. The dynamics of this latest partnership suggest a shift in political maneuvering as it appears to address immediate public concerns and seek legitimacy for both leaders. However, skepticism remains regarding the sincerity of these accommodations.
Critics of the handshake movement assert that such agreements risk trivializing the urgent issues voiced by the Kenyan populace, particularly young citizens who demand genuine representation and accountability. The historical reliance on handshakes to navigate political complexities reveals a trend that often prioritizes elite consolidation over progressive change.
As Kenya navigates these challenging political waters, the emergence of a new generation advocating for reform indicates a potential departure from the established political practices, highlighting a demand for a more inclusive approach to governance and representation. The handshake tradition thus finds itself at a crossroads, as both an emblem of past compromises and a potential barrier to the transformation that many Kenyans yearn for.
#PoliticsNews #AfricaNews