Recent developments in the Lebanon-Israel ceasefire negotiations highlight a complex interplay of diplomatic efforts and ongoing regional tensions. As representatives from both nations convene in southern Lebanon amidst continuing Israeli military activities, the pursuit of a stable and lasting agreement appears increasingly challenging. This backdrop underscores the importance of international support and collaboration, particularly from key players like the United States and Saudi Arabia, to enhance regional security and bolster Lebanon’s national integrity.
The committee overseeing the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah convened talks in southern Lebanon, marking a significant step in addressing ongoing regional tensions. Civilian and military representatives from Israel and Lebanon met in Naqoura on Friday for what was the 15th session since the truce was established in November 2024. These discussions come against the backdrop of escalating pressure from the United States and Israel, aimed at disarming the Lebanese group.
According to a statement from the U.S. embassy in Beirut, military delegations provided operational updates and underscored the necessity of strengthening the Lebanese army as a crucial guarantor of security in the area south of the Litani River. Concurrently, civilian participants focused on creating safe conditions for displaced residents to return to their homes, emphasizing the need for reconstruction and addressing economic priorities. They highlighted that sustainable political and economic development is essential for reinforcing security and achieving lasting peace.
The talks, however, unfold amid repeated Israeli violations of the ceasefire, which have included near-daily airstrikes across Lebanon, primarily targeting Hezbollah’s military operatives and infrastructure. Reporting from Naqoura, Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr noted the expectation that the discussions would concentrate on solidifying what has largely been a one-sided truce. Lebanon has expressed a strong desire for the return of its displaced citizens, as the Israeli army currently occupies approximately 10 square kilometers of Lebanese territory along the border.
Following the meetings, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun met with Simon Karam, appointed as the country’s chief civilian negotiator. Aoun emphasized the necessity of allowing tens of thousands of displaced Lebanese civilians to return to their homes to address broader issues within the negotiations. He also announced that the next committee meeting is scheduled for January 7.
Additionally, President Aoun welcomed a recent diplomatic agreement reached in Paris among the U.S., France, and Saudi Arabia, which aims to organize an international conference in early 2026. This event is intended to support the Lebanese army and enhance the country’s internal security forces. Representing Israel in the civilian talks, Yosef Dreznin, Deputy Director for Foreign Policy at Israel’s National Security Council, viewed the discussions as a continuation of efforts focused on the disarmament of Hezbollah.
While the Israeli Prime Minister’s office conveyed that economic projects were discussed to mitigate the Hezbollah threat, the Lebanese group has firmly rejected the idea of disarming amidst ongoing Israeli attacks and territorial occupation. Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s newly appointed Secretary-General, criticized the Lebanese government’s concessions without receiving tangible gains in return.
Experts like Paul Salem from the Middle East Institute suggest that, despite the limitations of the current talks, they may evolve into broader discussions regarding a complete cessation of hostilities. However, significant progress towards peace seems unlikely in the immediate future.
#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews