As the world remains vigilant over escalating military capabilities, Russia’s recent unveiling of its nuclear-powered cruise missile, the Burevestnik, generates both intrigue and skepticism. While Russian officials assert that the missile represents a groundbreaking advancement in strategic deterrence, experts question its impact amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. This dual narrative emphasizes the balance between national pride and the realities of military efficacy, reflecting broader concerns about security and stability in the global arena.
Kyiv, Ukraine – The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has claimed that the West harbors fears regarding the capabilities of Moscow’s newly developed nuclear-powered cruise missile, the Burevestnik, which is said to have the potential to reach any location on Earth while evading advanced air and missile defense systems. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stated during an interview with RIA Novosti that Western nations are apprehensive about what Russia may reveal next.
Zakharova recently emphasized that Moscow’s development and testing of the Burevestnik was a necessary response to perceived hostility from NATO. She characterized this initiative as a means to maintain a strategic balance, citing the need for Russia to address NATO’s increasingly destabilizing missile defense activities. The unveiling of the Burevestnik coincided with Russian President Vladimir Putin presenting state awards to its developers, underscoring the missile’s significance within the national defense narrative.
In conjunction with the Burevestnik, Putin also highlighted the successful testing of the Poseidon, an underwater nuclear-powered torpedo capable of devastating coastal regions with radioactive tsunamis. Claiming that the Burevestnik has surpassed all global missile systems in terms of flight range, Putin framed Russia’s nuclear advancements as part of a broader strategy to solidify its position as a major nuclear power.
Despite the ceremonial praise for the Burevestnik’s development, military and nuclear experts express skepticism regarding its effectiveness and the claims surrounding it. Analysts indicate that Moscow’s portrayals of its arsenal serve more as psychological tactics aimed at discouraging Western support for Ukraine rather than presenting groundbreaking military advancements. Pavel Podvig, director of the Russian Nuclear Forces Project at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, remarked on the missile’s capabilities, suggesting that while it can travel significant distances, it does not represent a transformative shift in military technology.
Critics of the missile development have noted that the Burevestnik’s test showcases the Kremlin’s desperation amidst challenges on the ground in Ukraine. Former Russian diplomat Boris Bondarev, who resigned in protest of the 2022 full-scale invasion, described the missile as a reflection of the Kremlin’s inability to exert political influence without resorting to threats.
Details regarding the missile remain sparse, leading to conflicting assessments of its capabilities. NATO has designated it the SSC-X-9 Skyfall, describing it as having a nuclear reactor that potentially provides prolonged aerial capabilities. During a recent announcement, Putin claimed that the Burevestnik successfully traveled 14,000 km (8,700 miles) in 15 hours, boasting its maneuverability and precision. Yet, Ukrainian military specialists have criticized the assertions, calling them exaggerated and asserting that the missile would be vulnerable to existing missile defense systems.
Developments surrounding the Burevestnik followed the cancellation of a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Putin, with Trump labeling the missile test as “inappropriate.” Despite calls for increased U.S. military readiness, some analysts believe any concrete response from Trump may be contingent upon his political ambitions ahead of upcoming elections.
In previous trials of the Burevestnik, only two out of numerous tests have reportedly succeeded, while early launches led to significant mishaps, including deadly radioactive accidents. Experts express doubts regarding the missile’s promised features and feasibility, with some suggesting it represents little more than a strategic illusion or a propagandistic tool rather than a feasible military asset.
The Burevestnik continues to provoke debate among military analysts, with differing views on its operational capabilities and potential to reshape the landscape of modern warfare. While authorities tout its innovation, critics maintain skepticism about the technology’s practicality and reliability in today’s complex geopolitical context.
#WorldNews #MiddleEastNews