In an age characterized by evolving warfare strategies, the United States increasingly resorts to hybrid warfare, leveraging a combination of economic sanctions, military interventions, and subversive tactics. Recent conflicts in Venezuela and Iran exemplify this troubling trend, drawing attention to the long-term repercussions of U.S. actions on the stability and sovereignty of nations. This article from ZezapTV dissects the complexities and consequences of these operations, raising critical questions about the enduring fallout of such a combative foreign policy approach.
The nuclear age poses significant challenges for the United States, necessitating a strategic shift away from traditional war in favor of hybrid warfare tactics to avoid the catastrophic implications of nuclear escalation. This shift has manifested recently in two prominent battlegrounds: Venezuela and Iran, where the U.S. has employed a multifaceted approach involving economic sanctions, strategic military strikes, cyber warfare, and a concerted effort to incite domestic unrest, indicating a substantial investment in these long-term CIA operations that are rapidly escalating towards widespread chaos.
In Venezuela, the U.S. has two primary objectives: controlling its rich oil reserves in the Orinoco Belt and dismantling the leftist government that has maintained power since 1999. This campaign dates back to 2002 when the CIA backed a coup attempt against the then-President Hugo Chávez. Following the failed coup, the U.S. intensified its hybrid warfare measures, which included imposing stringent economic sanctions, confiscating the country’s dollar reserves, and crippling Venezuela’s oil production, leading to widespread deprivation among the civilian population. Despite the turmoil instigated by U.S. intervention, the Venezuelan government has remained resilient.
The recent escalation under President Donald Trump includes bombing Caracas, kidnapping President Nicolás Maduro, stealing oil shipments, and imposing a naval blockade, actions that critics argue represent acts of war. Simultaneously, powerful pro-Zionist entities are reportedly benefiting from opportunities to seize Venezuelan oil assets, fueled by the country’s support for the Palestinian cause and alliances with Iran, prompting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to endorse U.S. military actions in Venezuela.
In tandem with operations in Venezuela, the ongoing hybrid war against Iran is gathering momentum. Historical tensions, ignited during the 1953 U.S.-instigated coup against democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, have evolved into a persistent campaign to undermine the Iranian government. The U.S. and Israel continue to pursue subversive tactics, including economic sabotage, targeted assassinations, and military intimidation. The potential for conflict to escalate into broader regional violence remains a critical concern, eliciting diplomatic interventions from Gulf allies to dissuade further military escalation.
Ultimately, the U.S.-Israel objective regarding Iran extends beyond negotiated settlements. The overarching ambition is to keep Iran economically destabilized and diplomatically isolated while applying internal pressure that may lead to regime change. This policy has been counterproductive, undermining any potential for peaceful negotiations, especially following Trump’s withdrawal from the 2016 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which had established a monitoring framework for Iran’s nuclear activities.
The fluctuating and often contradictory nature of U.S. rhetoric serves to illustrate the complexity of hybrid warfare, which thrives on deception, ambiguity, and misinformation. Past instances of U.S.-supported military actions underscore the urgent need for vigilance. Although recent signs hint at de-escalation, they should not be interpreted as a definitive shift, as the possibility of sudden military strike remains.
The ongoing crises in Venezuela and Iran highlight the U.S. and Israel’s entrenched reliance on hybrid warfare tactics. The collaborative efforts of the CIA, Mossad, and various military contractors have wrought chaos across Latin America and the Middle East for decades, leading to instability, adverse impacts on economic development, and significant refugee crises, without any beneficial outcomes for the populations affected.
Moreover, the continuous prioritization of hybrid warfare undermines the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the use of force and calls for the respect of national sovereignty. The only parties reaping rewards from this situation are those involved in the military-industrial complex, which has grown increasingly powerful, fueled by advancements in artificial intelligence and aggressive U.S. foreign policy choices.
For the global community, a collective rejection of these destructive practices is essential—one that advocates for the cessation of regime-change operations, unilateral sanctions, the weaponization of economic systems, and a renewed commitment to uphold the principles enshrined in international law. The American populace, largely opposed to the federal government’s aggressive tactics, faces challenges in voicing their dissent against the entrenched structures of power. This backdrop calls for a unified global and local effort to halt the pervasive cycle of hybrid warfare before it inflicts irreparable damage.
#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews